Observational Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Cartylis™ Food Supplement in Patients Suffering from Chronical Joint Pain

Eduard Vidovic*, Florent Rigaudier and Christine Juhel

Department of Medical, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

*Corresponding Author:
Eduard Vidovic
Department of Medical
University of Geneva
Geneva
Switzerland
E-mail: e.vidovic@aptissen.com

Received date: August 31, 2022, Manuscript No. IPCTN-22-14430; Editor assigned date: September 05, 2022, PreQC No. IPCTN-22-14430 (PQ); Reviewed date: September 20, 2022, QC No. IPCTN-22-14430; Revised date: December 23, 2022, Manuscript No. IPCTN-22-14430 (R); Published date: January 09, 2023, DOI: 10.36648/IPCTN.8.1.002

Citation: Vidovic E, Rigaudier F, Juhel C (2023) Observational Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Cartylis™ Food Supplement in Patients Suffering from Chronical Joint Pain. J Nutraceuticals Food Sci Vol:8 No:1

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nutraceuticals and Food Science

Abstract

Background: Aim of this study was to analyses the clinical outcomes after 3 months of daily intake of hydrolyzed collagen containing vitamins C, D and E and selenium on joint symptoms in patients suffering from symptomatic chronical osteoarthritis.

Methods: 143 adult patients having suffered from Osteoarthritis (OA) induced joint pain for at least 3 consecutive months were included by practicing rheumatologists. The intensity of the pain at rest and during movement as well as the degree of stiffness were evaluated with Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) from 0 (no pain/stiffness) to 100 (the worst imaginable pain/stiffness), upon inclusion and after 4 (W4) and 12 (W12) weeks of Cartylis supplementation with one vial per day.

Results: After 3 months of daily intake of studied food supplement, the pain intensity both at rest and on movement as well as the stiffness were significantly reduced (p<0.001) with even more marked reduction in the subgroup of patients with higher baseline pain score.

Conclusions: Nutritional supplementation alternatives based on hydrolyzed collagen can contribute to relieving OA symptoms and reducing long-term pharmacotherapy and its potential side effects.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis; Food supplement; Hydrolyzed collagen; Selenium; Total Population (TP)

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common forms of arthritis in the general population, accounting for more pain and functional disability than any other musculoskeletal disease. Is the result of mechanical and biological phenomena that destabilise the balance between cartilage regeneration and deterioration? OA causes joint pain and stiffness, inflammation, or even joint effusion there are currently no approved disease modifying drugs for OA. Its management is primarily targeting analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. In the absence of effective pharmacotherapy, many patients with OA turn to nutritional supplements and nutraceuticals, including collagen derivatives [1]. Nutraceuticals are orally administrated, biologically active compounds that have been shown to slow down the progression of the signs of aging. Hydrolyzed collagen, as a nutraceutical supplement, has been extensively shown to benefit human cartilage, skin and connective tissues [2]. Collagen hydrolysates are terms used to describe collagens that have been broken down into small peptides and amino acids in the presence of collagenases and high pressure. Several studies described the mechanism of absorption and distribution of collagen peptides in the body. It has been demonstrated that C14 labeled collagen peptides can reach skin, cartilage, bones, and muscles and remain in these tissues up to 14 days after a single ingestion. Thus, nutritional alternatives can contribute to relieving OA symptoms and reducing long term medicine consumption and its potential side effects. Cartylis is a food supplement based on hydrolysed collagen. It also contains vitamins C, D and E, and selenium. These different ingredients have synergistic properties that are thought to favour cartilage maintenance and reduce inflammation [3]. The aim of this observational study is to document in real life the clinical outcomes after 3 months of daily intake of cartylis on joint symptoms in patients suffering from symptomatic chronical osteoarthritis.

Materials and Methods

Adult patients having suffered from joint pain for at least 3 consecutive months, of which at least one joint had not been treated by infiltration or viscos supplementation within the previous 2 months, having no ongoing anti-inflammatory treatment and taking no other food supplements, were included by rheumatologists in their daily practice [4]. The intensity of the pain at rest and during movement as well as the degree of stiffness were evaluated with Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) from 0 (no pain/stiffness) to 100 (the worst imaginable pain/stiffness), upon inclusion and after 4 (W4) and 12 (W12) weeks of Cartylis supplementation with one vial per day. These evaluations were conducted for the Total Population (TP) and a Sub Population (SP) of patients with more intense symptoms, objectivized by a baseline VAS ≥ 30 (SP).

In total, 143 patients were included, of which 116 qualified to be evaluated for efficacy. The average age was 64.7 ± 9.3 years old, and 79% were women. The joint pain, present in the last 7 years on average and triggered most frequently by an arthritis flare up, had been mostly treated with analgesics (70%), infiltrations (48%), or NSAIDs (46%), and more rarely with phytotherapy or a food supplement (13%) (Table 1).

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII) and the overall satisfaction regarding the studied food supplement (Likert 5 point scale) were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks. Finally, the consumption of analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs and the undesirable side effects were noted [5]. The tolerability was evaluated by the description and the frequency of all events. The AE’s were coded according to the MedDRA classification.

Previous treatments Non (N/%) Oui (N/%) Total (N/%)
Analgesics intermittent 32 29.9 75 70.1 107 100
Oral NSAID intermittent 89 83.2 18 16.8 107 100
Analgesics 88 82.2 19 17.8 107 100
Weak opioides 105 98.1 2 1.9 107 100
Oral NSAID regularely 64 59.8 43 40.2 107 100
Topical NSAID 89 83.2 18 16.8 107 100
Systemic slow acting drugs for OA 88 82.2 19 17.8 107 100
Phytotherapy or food supplements 93 86.9 14 13.1 107 100
IA corticosteroid injections 68 63.6 39 36.4 107 100
IA hyaluronic acid injections 81 75.7 26 24.3 107 100

Table 1: Previous non-surgical treatments N=107.

Statistics

The characteristics of the subjects at inclusion in the study were described by means and standard deviation for the quantitative variables and by frequencies and numbers for the qualitative variables.

The primary endpoint is defined as the variation in pain or discomfort intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the most painful joint at baseline. It was compared between inclusions and after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of supplementation using paired Student tests. These analyses were performed for the intensity of pain (or discomfort) at rest and during movement [6].

Secondary endpoints: Joint stiffness was compared between inclusions and after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of supplementation using paired student tests. These changes were compared between D0 and W4, D0 and W12 and between W4 and W12. Satisfaction assessed on a Likert scale and perceived global improvement assessed by the PGII were analyzed and compared between the 4 weeks and 12 weeks follow up visits using paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Consumption of analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs was quantified and described at each visit. The comparison between the 4 weeks and 12 weeks follow up visits was made using McNemar's chi-square tests. The number of days of taking at least one analgesic/NSAID was not compared between visits.

Results

The most painful joint, most frequently situated in the lower (46%) or upper (36%) limbs, presented moderate pain (VAS=36.2 ± 25.5) at rest and more severe pain during movement (VAS=59.1 ± 20.2) [7]. Stiffness was also high (VAS=54.4 ± 23.3) as shown on Tables 2 and 3.

Localisation of the most painful joint N %
Head 1 1
Cervical spine 4 4
Shoulder 3 3
Lumbar spine 2 2
Pelvis 8 7.9
Upper limb 36 35.6
Lower limb 47 46.5
Total 101 100

Table 2: Localization of the most painful joint N=101.

Pain at baseline N DM Mean SD Median Minimum Maximum Lower threshold CI95 Upper threshold CI95
Pain at rest 116 0 36.2 25.5 37 0 100 31.5 40.9
Pain at movement 116 0 59.1 20.2 60 17 100 55.4 62.8
Stiffness 116 0 54.4 23.3 54.5 0 100 50.1 58.7

Table 3: Joint symptoms (pain and stiffness) at baseline N=116.

With a daily dose of the food supplement, the intensity of the pain at rest was progressively reduced by up to 37% (median) at W12, where the value of the VAS was significantly lower than that of the base VAS (25.9 ± 24.1, p<0.01). The analysis by sub-group showed a higher and more significant pain reduction as of W4 (median: -17%), with maximum reduction at W12 (median: -55%) for SP patients.

The pain relief was more noticeable during movement as of W4 (-25%) and remained significant at W12 (median: -36%). After 4 and 12 weeks, the stiffness was significantly reduced by 23% and 39% (median). The improvement was slightly more noticeable for SP patients (Figure 1).

Nutraceuticals-Science-Pain

Figure 1: Pain at movement. Patients with baseline VAS score ≥ 30 (n=92).

After 3 months of supplementation, 77% of patients felt there was a significant improvement and 62% declared to be satisfied with the food supplement. Between the inclusion and W4 and between W4 and W12, 60% and 68% of patients respectively had consumed neither analgesics nor anti-inflammatory drugs. Among the consumers, the number of days per month with a consumption of medicines tended to lower (median of 5 at W4 against 4 at W12). The treatment was globally very well tolerated. 9 study participants (6.2%) have reported some transitory intestinal disorders but the causality and relatedness to Cartylis could not have been clearly established (Figure 2).

Nutraceuticals-Science-Evolution

Figure 2: Evolution of the VAS score for stiffness between baseline and Week 12 (n=113).

Discussion

Collagen hydrolysates have demonstrated some evidence of efficacy in a handful of controlled clinical trials, but their ability to treat and reverse advanced joint disease remains to be confirmed in larger clinical trials, as is the case for other nutritional supplements. Here the authors acknowledge the limitations of this open label PMS study such as the absence of placebo or active control group as well as the absence of more objective parameters. Still, pain, function and stiffness as reported by patients on a VAS remain crucial clinical endpoints, especially for a chronical disabling disease like OA. We therefore consider that these results add to a more comprehensive outlook on the efficacy and safety of collagen derivatives in OA symptom relief, hence their place as an alternative to long term pharmacotherapy.

Conclusion

This real life study of patients suffering from osteoarthritis joint pain, functional disability and stiffness demonstrated the benefit of the cartylis food supplement in the conservative, non-pharmacological treatment of joint pain and functional discomfort, notably for patients with moderate to severe symptoms.

Its excellent tolerability and its favourable impact on analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug consumption confirm the benefit of using cartylis to relieve chronic OA symptoms.

References

open access journals, open access scientific research publisher, open access publisher
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image

Share This Article